mstislavl: (Default)
[personal profile] mstislavl
I believe that the animals tested on should still be treated well, but I also appreciate that many human lives have been saved thanks to Animal testing.

http://www.thepeoplespetition.org.uk/signup/

Date: 2006-05-17 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farraige.livejournal.com
and so they would if there were an alternative. somebody propagating this line of view sounds like John Prescott who advocate getting the nation out of their cars but aren't prepared to introduce more trains and buses and make them cheaper. (I know you've never lived outside of cities, but there are some areas that only get two bus services a day.)

if: catch 22

Date: 2006-05-21 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gerasirdis.livejournal.com
>>people opposing animal testing should
>>refrain from use of any phamaceuticals
>>and anti-cancer treatments
>and so they would if there
>were an alternative.
And this is asking for the impossible. Animals are used for research ONLY when there is no alternative. If there was a working alternative developed without animal testing, no one would bother to come up with yet another cancer treatment developed using (expensive, time consuming and heavily red-taped) animal testing.

Profile

mstislavl: (Default)
mstislavl

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 13th, 2025 06:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios