mstislavl: (Default)
[personal profile] mstislavl
I believe that the animals tested on should still be treated well, but I also appreciate that many human lives have been saved thanks to Animal testing.

http://www.thepeoplespetition.org.uk/signup/
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-05-17 08:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] farraige.livejournal.com
after a new mascara, eye lifting cream or eyeliner are tested on a rabbit (rabbits are chosen because they lack tear ducts and can't wash the irritant away) their cornea is eroded and a blind animal is put down.

ditto for washing powders and facial cleansers
From: [identity profile] gerasirdis.livejournal.com
Now this really puzzles me. All in all, drugs that haven't been tested properly could only kill tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, if it were a common disease. On the other hand, if something goes wrong in cosmetics department, number of victims could easily run into tens of millions or even more. So why are we willing to go an extra mile for few potential victims, and yet we are reluctant to take exactly the same precautionary steps to (possibly) save many more?

Profile

mstislavl: (Default)
mstislavl

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 05:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios