очeредная мысль, развить которую не хватит терпения и гуманитарного образования

[mstislavl]

человечество явно распадается на две субкультуры: "городскую" и "деревенскую".
первая характеризиуется универсальностью, космополитичностью потребляемого культурнго
продукта, к сожалению, в основном американского, консьюмеризмом, фрагменированиeм
общества, толерантностью на фоне пофигизма. это культура сродни порядку,
устанавливающемуся в колонии птиц на морском побережьe, где высокая плотность
и сосуществованиe разных видов на ограниченной площади вынуждают их
быть толерантными к нарушению гнездовых территорий.

деревенская сохраняет патриархальные ценности:
поддержка личности семьeй и родом в широком смысле, но неприятие нового, косность, искусственoe
ограничениe контактов с широким миром. эта культура - призводноe от инстинктивного поведения родовых групп приматов, а потом примитивных обществ, когда селекция идет на уровне скорее рода, а не индивидуума. а постоянство условий обитания позволяет сохранять и передавать оптимальные стереотипы поведения
в течениe многих поколений.

конфликт между "городской" и деревенской моралью хорошо заметен в Турции, где
элита тянет страну в Евросоюз с eго правами человека и мaтериальным процветаниeм,
тем временем в турецких деревнях братья и отцы по-прежнему убивают девушек
за "потерю чести".

целые страны пытаются культивировать "деревенскую мораль", видя в ней путь
упрочения государственности. например, Южная Корея. и Беларусь. а также, несмотря на величину, Китай.
доктрина урбанизированного государства (Великобритания ) - либерализм, деревенского -
патриотизм в форме "ура". впрочем, вне зависимости от доктрины,
страны эти готовы воевать.

Comments

OK, you win

[gerasirdis.livejournal.com]

>Please restrain yourself from wanting to engage me in discussion
So you wanna walk around spilling your poisonous bilge of lies unchallenged? OK, let it be your way, challenging your believes is rather futile anyway- see below why (CAMOCTO||). However, I reserve myself a right to make an ironic comment or two. On top of that, I already learned enough on the subject of "wide russian soul" for now. On top of that, we are falling into rounds of repetition anyway.

[farraige.livejournal.com]

You are a bitter and twisted man. you live by your lies propagated by the justest Lietuvos Rytas that you take as an unquestionable source.

Where was I spoiling "poisonous bilge"? Please justify yourself, you're supposed to be a scientiest -- give me an example or two.

You chose to label my soul "wide", these were never my own words. It's up to you whether you want to get up to arguing against your own description, and frankly, I no longer believe you're sane so why don't you just go ahead and give us a highly entertaining split personality show? Incidentally, your autonym could be challenged on the basis of your regular debaucheries we've all seen, but I'm not petty like you, so I won't. "Gerai" indeed.

So far you've achieved one thing: you have managed to completely dispel the liking I was harbouring for the Litnuanians (partly through a lying Lithuanian whore who abused my friendship and support of many years to satisfy her desire to mate uncrontrollably and partly through people like yourself, who will look so hard to pick a fight they have to resort to creating one in the end.) You're unbelievably aggressive, and your fighting methods are so low they're undeserving of any reasonable comment. It's not up to me to try and reform you; I'm glad I have people of sound mind and morals around me who I call my friends.

a wide-souled bipolar bear on the red square

[gerasirdis.livejournal.com]

As for "spoiling poisonous bilge", it was "spilling poisonous bilge OF LIES", not a chemical substance or smth :-).

As for "gerasirdis" (=kind-hearted), it is used in IRONIC (i.e. more like the opposite) term. Oddly enough, it actually was mstislavl who assigned me this nickname in livejournal, before that I only was using it in some (rather gruesome and backstabbing) computer strategy game.

As for a "wide russian soul", "(bi)polar bears" and other (arguably senseless) cliches, from now on I am going to apologize twice* for every cliche I use-once- before using it, and then after using it.

>Please restrain yourself from wanting
>to engage me in discussion
and
>Please justify yourself, you're supposed to be a
>scientiest -- give me an example or two.
I'm confused... So do you want me, outsider with different point of view to be engaged in your talks, or do you prefer to "sing to a choir", i.e. to chat with like-minded people only?
___________________________________________
*or once, if at all

[farraige.livejournal.com]

okay, how many PhD's does it to understand that failing to comply with

>>Please restrain yourself from wanting
>to engage me in discussion

leads to (your twisted convoluted ways -- you're still hoping to trip me up, aren't you? you'll fail -- I'm smarter than you -- your unfounded accusations that are the fruit of your sick mind)

a request that you provide a basis for some of the accusations you throw my way? It must be so much harder than 2x2, I'm sorry.

Now, if you don't stop, I really am beginning to lose my patience. When I do, I'm nasty, and I'll hurt... is that what you want? Really? I can be quite vicious, and unlike you, who fabricates feebly, I lash where it hurts. It's your call -- but I find you disgusting.

2x2=5 for large values of 2

[gerasirdis.livejournal.com]

>I'm smarter than you
>When I do, I'm nasty, and I'll hurt...
"Being strong is like being a lady. If you claim you are, you are not" (c) somebody not me. I'd guess the same applies for being smart.